![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe1O1upnh0AKZyBfZMBLkPV-q_1uqlf27i4HnNrG55RZlvVfcjAKuaGrLBwHBFt-TeFRoa-aBRDP0UZ74VPk-nBQj4uEPfJ7NsKE1Ev5AdVBp5YW2NQ9fzkvkqo6ACYGjosm27yb76PIjn/s1600/images.jpg)
when have two side by side, but I'm not a complete idiot, not completely, I won't compare apple to oranges, we need at least two compatible films. More often than
not we see the horror movies these days are either complete reboots of obscure titles or complete rip offs When I first found about the remake of 1980's groundbreaking slasher movie MANIAC I didn't know how to feel, the movie was ahead of its time in its storytelling,it could benefit from a modernization of its story it has a lot of relevance in today's world but are classics better left alone?? It could be biz as usual a sub-par shot for shot remake that does the original no justice or a complete retelling with the same core story and plot twists that make it a brilliant re-imagining of a classic, leaving genre purist with little to say afterwards. Either way, it is pretty fair that we compare the two movies and see which is the better film and if both are worth a watch or not.
MANIAC(1980)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAffz6_AX_i61bi_2G4FgAEdrMe2UvVw1-3rXonB5gtfjTjJE2BvqdOMfctkz0FeWJwds11Vym3KjeLiBA5eA82JGBqL5mHProAvwmBqv7h9i16NaAZT5M6TCEy75l0pe-nn5FCpU3QtGj/s320/maniac_ver2.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixx8bwR6QRtCj996ae-3Nuw4WgzaFBEO8gHJK1yD9QLBUdn2wTCfsvU0YXT2FYTBPgKwpRrV42rJ-SpqfiachIjjjLw-xFPtf1JjIdTwYcmGhPXDZPe72IHM5dAqwF9dsJVmSzg1HUw7gV/s400/Maniac+80.png)
Maniac(2013)
Using the same basic story as the original, there nothing much to be said on that front. Elijah Wood as Frank was brilliant, he portrayed the disturbed role pretty well. The most notable difference between the two films is the almost exclusive first person POV used in the remake, at first this was a pretty cool gimmick but towards the end of the movie it got to be just that...way to gimmicky for my taste. There was an unrealistic amount of mirrors and reflective surfaces in these peoples homes, this took away from the experience, taking me out of the story by making me realize that I in fact was watching a movie, I'm not asking for complete submersion but if they used first person view in a handful of scenes it wouldn't have come across as forced. Although, when they did pan out of first person POV so that you could actually see Frank's face while he stabs and stabs and stabs was a sick and twisted flash of pure genius.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjav6EueryHcXFrfQE7xRJLPysrE-NF3HmJxC6Zc4pzQLTwT-zsNBeOH5eqVJL6jzfHbgWbDPC5by_drKyiujClJviKT2y2ykrH0zl11NZVM1OCrH4TcnlIw5ea5WhkL_CQ1awrTX2AYi4b/s400/maniac+2012.png)
version.
*VS*
Side by side both are very good slasher movies, both have crazy murdering dudes, both have creative and gory death scenes, both have sexy ladies dying all over the place...but the edge has to go to the original Maniac from 1980, only for the less gimmicky use of camera and Tom Savini's exploding head. But both films come recommended as far as slasher films go.
No comments:
Post a Comment